Choose one metric
Decide whether top means reactions, views, or forwards and state any normalization.
Workflow · Post ranking
Find top Telegram posts by one clear metric
Rank eligible posts from selected Telegram channels by reactions, views, or forwards with citations and measured-coverage details.
Direct answer. The Ocean can rank eligible posts from selected Telegram sources by a single captured metric such as reactions, views, or forwards. The result preserves post citations and reports which eligible posts were measured, pending, or missing rather than treating missing data as zero.
Research fit
Who this workflow is for
Analysts looking for a review queue of high-engagement posts inside a defined source set and period.
Set sources and period
Use one corpus and window so posts are being ranked under comparable conditions.
Review the ranked posts
Open citations and inspect content, publication time, and coverage before drawing conclusions.
Practical module
A post-ranking specification
Define top before looking at results.
MetricOne engagement field and whether the latest captured snapshot is used.
Ranking scopeSources, period, per-channel or overall rule, and number of results.
Coverage ruleThe minimum measured proportion required to call the ranking comparative.
Top-post ranking request
Ask for one metric, a fixed scope, and explicit missing-data treatment.
Rank the top [number] posts in [selected sources] from [start] to [end] by [reactions, views, or forwards], using [raw or normalized values]. Include citations, snapshot timing, eligible and measured counts, and missing-coverage reasons.
Inputs to set
- Metric
- The one captured field that determines rank order.
- Scope
- Selected sources, date range, timezone, and overall or per-channel ranking.
- Result size
- The number of posts needed for the human review queue.
Expected output
- Ordered posts with metric values and citations
- Snapshot timestamp and normalization
- Eligible, measured, and missing coverage
Review before use
- Never rank missing data as zero
- Open each top-post citation
- Avoid equating engagement with credibility
Read the complete resource
# Top-post ranking request Ask for one metric, a fixed scope, and explicit missing-data treatment. ## Query Rank the top [number] posts in [selected sources] from [start] to [end] by [reactions, views, or forwards], using [raw or normalized values]. Include citations, snapshot timing, eligible and measured counts, and missing-coverage reasons. ## Inputs - **Metric:** The one captured field that determines rank order. - **Scope:** Selected sources, date range, timezone, and overall or per-channel ranking. - **Result size:** The number of posts needed for the human review queue. ## Expected output - Ordered posts with metric values and citations - Snapshot timestamp and normalization - Eligible, measured, and missing coverage ## Review checks - [ ] Never rank missing data as zero - [ ] Open each top-post citation - [ ] Avoid equating engagement with credibility
Boundaries
What this does not establish
- Missing snapshots are not equivalent to zero engagement
- Rank order can change as metrics accumulate over time
- High engagement does not establish accuracy, endorsement, or influence
Founding research pilot
Apply with a post-ranking task
Bring one recurring research job and a small set of public sources. We will assess fit personally before offering a pilot.
Apply for a 14-day research pilot
30 founding researcher places · rolling admission · personal reply within 2 business days
Analytics cluster
More ways to investigate this result
Continue researching
Related guides
Publication notes. This page was reviewed before publication and is scheduled for review by 2026-12-19. Facts used: product-chat-engagement · product-citations · product-selected-sources